Financial Integrity Intelligence

See what your
ERP missed.

VERIQENTRA is an independent financial-integrity intelligence layer that analyses governed exports from ERP, accounting, banking and spreadsheets, links transactions across sources, and surfaces evidence-backed exceptions for authorised human review.

Find what may have leaked. Verify what happened. Strengthen what happens next.

Request a free Readiness Check See how it works
Full supplied population within scope — no silent sampling Evidence, not accusation Private deployment option available by scope
CASE  INT-000482 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC DUPLICATE — REVIEW REQUIRED

ABC Traders

ReferenceINV-00341
Date31-Jul-2026
Amount684,000
POPO-981

A.B.C. Traders

Reference341
Date02-Aug-2026
Amount684,000
POPO-981
Status
Potential
Matched signals
4 of 4
Date delta
2 days
Potential exposure
RS 684,000
A short test

Six questions about your own books.

Not trick questions. Every one is answerable from data you already own — if anyone has ever looked.

?

How many of your vendors share a bank account with another vendor?

?

Which payments exceed the true open obligation after invoices, credits and prior settlements are considered?

?

Which advances issued two years ago are still sitting unadjusted today?

?

How much in supplier credit notes was issued to you but never claimed?

?

Which ERP or payment-file payments lack matching bank-debit evidence by amount and currency where bank corroboration is required?

?

Which invoices become economic duplicates after references and identity signals are normalised?

→

If you cannot answer these consistently across the supplied population, you may have an integrity blind spot worth testing.

The blind spot

Three strong controls. Three different jobs.

VERIQENTRA does not replace your ERP, your auditors or your finance team. It adds a cross-source integrity layer focused on transaction relationships and evidence.

Your ERP

It controls transactions as configured.

ERP controls are strongest when master data, references, tolerances and workflows are configured consistently. Cross-period and cross-source economic relationships can still require a separate integrity layer.

Workflow control ≠ cross-source integrity reconstruction
Your auditors

They have a different assurance objective.

Financial-statement audits are designed to support an audit opinion. Procedures may use sampling, analytics or full-population tests depending on risk; that objective is different from a dedicated transaction-integrity review.

Different objective · complementary assurance
Your team

Human judgment is essential — but it does not scale by itself.

Finance teams know the business context. VERIQENTRA gives them a governed way to inspect cross-source relationships across large populations without replacing human judgment.

Machines scale the population · humans retain decision authority

Small percentages. Real money.

Potential leakage rarely appears as one obvious exception. It can accumulate quietly — a duplicate here, an unclaimed credit there — across thousands of ordinary transactions.

40,000
Transactions / year
→
80
Worth reviewing
→
Millions
In potential RS exposure

Illustrative only. Actual exception rates, confirmed exposure and recoverable amounts vary by business, data quality, scope and available evidence — which is why VERIQENTRA measures your supplied population rather than quoting an industry average.

Designed to analyse suitably structured governed exports from systems including Odoo · SAP Business One · NetSuite · QuickBooks · Sage · Excel and other financial systems — without requiring a native connector for the initial review.
What VERIQENTRA finds

Potential exceptions that hide between the rows.

VERIQENTRA links records across sources, periods and lifecycle states to identify relationships worth review — without turning an exception into an accusation.

Duplicate payments

One bill settled twice — across cheque, transfer or separate payment batches.

Unadjusted advances

Supplier advances issued long ago and never applied against an invoice.

Unapplied credit notes

Credits the supplier issued that your team never claimed against payment.

Economic duplicate invoices

The same economic claim re-entered with a changed, shortened or normalised reference.

Unsupported payment excess

A payment exceeds the supported economic obligation after credits, advances and prior settlements.

Shared vendor bank accounts

Different vendor records pointing to the same bank account or payment destination — a relationship that deserves review.

The mechanism

Cross-source evidence, with independent bank corroboration where applicable.

VERIQENTRA links governed ERP and accounting records across vendors, invoices, payments, credits, advances and bank evidence. When independent bank data is required and available, it corroborates whether value actually moved. When required evidence is absent or unreliable, the control is reported NOT TESTABLE — never clean.

Vendor master
Invoice
Payment
Credits / advances
Bank evidence
independent corroboration where applicable

A payment with no matching bank debit where corroboration is required. A payment that exceeds the supported obligation after credits and advances. Two invoice references that resolve to the same economic claim. Each is evidence for review — and never a conclusion about intent.

What a finding looks like

Not one trick. A chain of them.

Duplicates are the easiest to explain. These are the ones that cost more — reconstructed as a chronology, because sequence is often where the story is.

CASE  INT-000731 PAYMENT EXCEEDS SUPPORTED OBLIGATION
14 Jul Supplier invoice — RS 500,000
16 Jul Available credit note — RS 80,000
18 Jul Unadjusted advance available — RS 50,000
21 Jul Payment recorded — RS 500,000 against supported obligation of RS 370,000
Potential excess
RS 130,000
Credits and advances reduce the supported economic obligation. The excess remains Potential until authorised review.
CASE  INT-000958 SHARED VENDOR BANK ACCOUNT
03 Aug Vendor A master — bank account ending 2841
06 Aug Vendor B master — same bank account ending 2841
07 Aug Payments recorded to both vendor identities
— Shared payment destination requires business-context verification
Potential relationship
REVIEW
Shared banking can be legitimate. The relationship is evidence for review, not a conclusion.

Every finding is presented as evidence requiring review — with source file, row and the reasoning behind it. VERIQENTRA does not assert intent, and it never names a conclusion the data cannot support.

The platform

Start with historical integrity. Expand only when the operating model is ready.

QuickScan and governed review are the current foundation. Continuous monitoring and pre-release protection are expansion modes, not substitutes for the evidence and review controls underneath.

01

QuickScan

Current foundation

A fast automated read of your existing transaction data that surfaces where integrity risk is concentrated — before any deep engagement.

02

Recovery Review

Governed human review

Historical analysis with authorised human confirmation, dismissal and recovery tracking. Potential exposure stays potential until the governed review process confirms it.

03

Monitor

Expansion mode / roadmap

Designed to apply the same governed integrity controls to new periods on a recurring basis, subject to deployment scope and operating readiness.

04

Protect

Expansion mode / roadmap

Designed to place governed integrity review before selected high-risk releases, subject to workflow integration, authority design and deployment scope.

How an engagement runs

A governed review, beginning with evidence readiness.

1

You export

You provide the governed source datasets required for the selected controls — typically vendors, invoices, payments, credits, advances and bank evidence where applicable. We send exact instructions per system; direct ERP access is not required for QuickScan.

2

We analyse

The released population passes through lifecycle-aware integrity controls with provenance, replay protection and cross-source evidence linkage. The platform never silently truncates an over-limit portal analysis; it rejects the full request instead.

3

You receive evidence

You receive evidence-backed findings with source lineage and a clear separation between Potential, Confirmed and Recovered. Missing required evidence is reported NOT TESTABLE, not clean.

Your data, your terms

Financial data this sensitive deserves controlled handling and clear deployment choices.

Governed, isolated intake

Files are quarantined on isolated infrastructure, hashed on arrival and handled under preservation controls. Evidence retention is defined in the engagement terms and handled under the agreed retention and controlled-deletion procedure.

Private deployment option

Customer-controlled or dedicated deployment can be provided subject to deployment scope, infrastructure and security readiness.

Full chain of custody

Every file, mapping and approval is recorded in an append-only audit trail — so any finding can be traced back to the exact source row.

Evidence sufficiency, never assumed

VERIQENTRA validates source readiness and population completeness before relying on the supplied evidence. Where required evidence is insufficient, affected controls are reported NOT TESTABLE rather than clean.

Start with a free Financial Integrity Readiness Check.

Share a limited data inventory, sample structure or masked extracts as appropriate. We assess whether the available evidence can support useful integrity controls, identify likely testable areas and state the key evidence gaps. Detailed transaction analysis and Recovery Review are scoped separately as a paid engagement.

Request your free readiness check

No obligation · NDA before sensitive data is shared · Detailed analysis is a separate scoped engagement